← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB365
SB365 lets Texas public colleges offer a broader academic fresh start, but it does not require every college to use a five-year cutoff.
Official caption: Relating to the period for which an applicant for admission as an undergraduate student to a public institution of higher education is entitled to an academic fresh start.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Eckhardt, Cook, Flores, Menéndez, Parker. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB365 lets Texas public colleges offer a broader academic fresh start, but it does not require every college to use a five-year cutoff.
- There is a tradeoff: if a college uses the expanded period, it must disregard all credits and grades from that period and cannot award credit for those courses.
- Each public institution must adopt a fresh-start admissions policy, post it on its website and submit it to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
- The bill also updates the excess-credit-hours calculation used for state funding: for a student in a fresh-start bachelor’s program, previously earned hours disregarded under the institution’s policy are excluded from that calculation, not only hours at least 10 years old.
What does it do?
SB365 lets Texas public colleges offer a broader academic fresh start, but it does not require every college to use a five-year cutoff. Existing law lets a Texas resident seeking undergraduate admission elect not to have coursework from 10 or more years before the starting semester considered. SB365 lets an institution disregard a more recent additional period too, but not credits or grades earned during the preceding five years. The institution’s policy determines how far it uses that option. Final law; Existing fresh-start framework.
There is a tradeoff: if a college uses the expanded period, it must disregard all credits and grades from that period and cannot award credit for those courses. An applicant cannot keep only the good credits while dropping only the bad grades within that period. The existing rule also denies credit for the older coursework excluded under the original 10-year fresh start. Ordinary admissions criteria still apply; a fresh-start election is not guaranteed admission or erasure of every record for every purpose.
Each public institution must adopt a fresh-start admissions policy, post it on its website and submit it to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. The policy must state the period of coursework considered. The bill was signed and took effect May 6, 2025; the admissions changes apply beginning with fall 2025. Official history; Policy and application dates.
The bill also updates the excess-credit-hours calculation used for state funding: for a student in a fresh-start bachelor’s program, previously earned hours disregarded under the institution’s policy are excluded from that calculation, not only hours at least 10 years old. The change applies to funding recommendations for the biennium starting September 1, 2025 for students entering these programs in fall 2025 or later. Earlier entrants remain under the prior funding rule. It does not promise a new scholarship or automatic financial-aid eligibility. Existing funding provision; Funding amendment and transition.
What changed along the way?
The introduced, Senate committee, engrossed, House committee and enrolled versions have the same operative provisions; only separators and final certification differ. The amendment index lists no amendments, and both committees reported the bill without amendments. The Senate passed it April 10 and the House April 23, 2025. Text versions; Amendment index.
The enacted change preserves the existing 10-year entitlement and adds institutional flexibility for a shorter lookback, public policy disclosure and the matching funding adjustment. It is not a universal replacement of “10 years” with “five years.” Exact enacted language.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
The March 26, 2025 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal impact and assumes costs can be absorbed with existing resources. It is the only listed fiscal note and analyzes the introduced provisions, which were enacted unchanged. Fiscal note.
Returning students may be able to move beyond older poor grades sooner at institutions choosing the expanded option. They may also lose usable credits and need to repeat coursework, adding time or expense. Colleges must publish their policy and administer the revised admissions and funding rules. Applicants should use the institution’s posted policy to understand the applicable period; this briefing does not claim that a particular college adopted the shortest permitted lookback.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.