2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB387

SB387 raises the minimum official bond for covered county judges handling guardianship or probate matters to $500,000.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to bond requirements for certain judges.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Zaffirini. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB387 raises the minimum official bond for covered county judges handling guardianship or probate matters to $500,000. It applies to judges of statutory county courts under Government Code 25.0006 and county judges under 26.001 when they preside over those proceedings. The earlier minimum was $100,000 in counties with 125,000 or fewer residents and $250,000 in larger counties; the new minimum no longer depends on population. An official bond backs faithful performance of duties. It is not bail for criminal defendants, and $500,000 is the bond amount—not an annual premium or salary. Final law; Prior statutory-county-court provision; Prior county-judge provision.

The bill also removes a broad exemption for statutory county-court judges who did not handle guardianships. That brings otherwise covered judges back under the section: those handling probate or guardianship fall under the $500,000 minimum, while the general $1,000–$10,000 range remains for those outside that category. The commissioners court sets and approves the bond within the applicable requirements.

Two statutory-county-court exclusions remain: county criminal-court judges, and statutory probate-court judges who meet the separate bond/insurance/self-insurance provision. Statutory probate courts already had their own $500,000 bond rule. Existing county options to use insurance instead of the guardianship/probate bond are not repealed. The bill therefore should not be read as requiring every Texas judge to buy a new $500,000 bond. Separate statutory-probate-court rule; Retained insurance option and other provisions; County-judge insurance option.

The bill was signed June 20, 2025 and took effect September 1, 2025. It retains the requirement to execute the bond before beginning the duties of office and does not supply a separate mid-term replacement deadline. Official history; Enacted timing.

What changed along the way?

The introduced, Senate committee, engrossed, House committee and enrolled texts have the same operative provisions. The amendment index lists no amendments; both committees reported without amendments. The Senate passed the bill April 16 and the House May 23, 2025. All text versions; Amendment index.

The actual changes are the higher guardianship/probate minimum in two sections and removal of the no-guardianship exemption in the statutory-county-court section. The ordinary bond range, faithful-performance condition and separate statutory probate-court framework were not newly created by this bill. Exact amendments.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

The March 25 and May 1, 2025 fiscal notes expect no significant state or local fiscal impact and assume costs can be absorbed with existing resources. They do not quote a premium, quantify county-by-county costs or promise that every loss will be paid. Introduced fiscal note; Engrossed fiscal note.

Larger bond coverage may provide greater financial protection for failures covered by the bond, especially in smaller counties where the statutory minimum rises fivefold. Counties and covered judges must account for the higher minimum or retained insurance alternative. Actual protection and cost depend on the applicable bond or insurance terms; the bill does not make the stated amount an automatic payment to a person involved in a probate or guardianship case.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.