← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB455
SB455 sets Texas-location and Texas-law requirements, with exceptions, for arbitration clauses in surplus lines insurance covering a risk wholly within Texas.
Official caption: Relating to arbitration provisions in certain surplus lines insurance contracts.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Middleton. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB455 sets Texas-location and Texas-law requirements, with exceptions, for arbitration clauses in surplus lines insurance covering a risk wholly within Texas.
- The final text says the contract must provide for arbitration conducted in Texas and governed by Texas law.
- A separate exception applies to surplus lines contracts with over $2 million in insured value: the insurer and policyholder may mutually agree to another arbitration venue and another state’s laws, provided the agreement is “in a form.” The statute uses that phrase; it does not name a particular approved form or specify a premium-credit condition in this separate exception.
- The bill became law without the governor’s signature on May 27, 2025.
What does it do?
SB455 sets Texas-location and Texas-law requirements, with exceptions, for arbitration clauses in surplus lines insurance covering a risk wholly within Texas. Surplus lines coverage is a specialized insurance market used for risks that standard insurers often cannot or will not cover. The bill regulates a contract that contains an arbitration agreement; it does not require every policy to add one. Enrolled law; Official explanation of surplus lines.
The final text says the contract must provide for arbitration conducted in Texas and governed by Texas law. Its next clause requires Texas-law interpretation of the insurance contract, followed by an “unless” provision: the insurer and policyholder must agree to a different venue after the insurer gives written notice of its request, and the insurer must give a premium credit for the policyholder’s costs resulting from the venue change. The placement of that exception changed during passage; this is not an unconditional ban on every out-of-state arbitration agreement. Section 981.101(d).
A separate exception applies to surplus lines contracts with over $2 million in insured value: the insurer and policyholder may mutually agree to another arbitration venue and another state’s laws, provided the agreement is “in a form.” The statute uses that phrase; it does not name a particular approved form or specify a premium-credit condition in this separate exception. The threshold is insured value, not a claim payment or annual premium. Section 981.101(e).
The bill became law without the governor’s signature on May 27, 2025. It took effect September 1, 2025, but the new requirements apply only to contracts delivered, issued for delivery or renewed on or after January 1, 2026. Earlier contracts remain governed by the prior law for this purpose. Official history; Contract transition rule.
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill had Texas arbitration-location and governing-law requirements without these exceptions. The Senate committee substitute narrowed the provision to risks wholly within Texas and added written notice, agreement and premium-credit conditions for a different venue. Those conditions originally followed the arbitration-location clause. The engrossed and House committee versions retained that structure. Introduced version; Senate substitute; All versions.
The only indexed floor amendment, offered by Morgan and adopted May 9, moved the notice/agreement/premium-credit exception after the contract-interpretation clause and added the separate over-$2-million exception. Both changes survive in the enrolled law. The Senate concurred May 14; no conference rewrite is shown. The older House committee analysis describes the pre-amendment wording and should not be substituted for the final text. Amendment index; Adopted amendment.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Policyholders covered by the Texas baseline may avoid distant arbitration, while insurers and policyholders retain the specified negotiated exceptions. The premium credit in subsection (d) addresses costs caused by a venue change; it is not a general premium refund. The bill does not set a dollar schedule for that credit or guarantee a cheaper policy, a successful claim or a particular arbitration outcome. Requirements and exceptions.
The March 3 introduced, March 27 Senate-substitute and May 12 House-passed/final-indexed fiscal notes anticipate no significant state fiscal impact, assuming costs can be absorbed with existing resources, and no local-government fiscal impact. They do not estimate private arbitration expenses or premium changes. Final indexed fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.