← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB482
SB482 increases penalties for certain assaults and harassment against utility workers and adds them to the law against interference with public duties.
Official caption: Relating to the offenses of assault, harassment, and interference with public duties committed against certain employees or agents of a utility.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Alvarado, Blanco, Cook, Hinojosa, Juan "Chuy". This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB482 increases penalties for certain assaults and harassment against utility workers and adds them to the law against interference with public duties.
- For bodily-injury assault, the utility-worker provision makes the offense a third-degree felony when the defendant knows or reasonably should know the victim is a utility employee or agent performing a duty within that role.
- Harassment becomes a Class A rather than the ordinary Class B misdemeanor when the defendant knows or reasonably should know the victim is a covered utility worker performing duties.
- Interference with a utility employee or agent performing duties is added to Section 38.15.
- The assault and harassment definition lists specified electric, telecommunications, cable/video and gas utilities, oil/gas-related pipelines, electric cooperatives and municipally owned utilities.
- The act also adds all Section 38.15 offenses—not only those involving utility workers—to the existing disaster/evacuation-area penalty rule.
What does it do?
SB482 increases penalties for certain assaults and harassment against utility workers and adds them to the law against interference with public duties. Signed June 20, 2025, it applies to offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025; earlier offenses remain governed by earlier law. History; Final law.
For bodily-injury assault, the utility-worker provision makes the offense a third-degree felony when the defendant knows or reasonably should know the victim is a utility employee or agent performing a duty within that role. The underlying assault requires intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causing bodily injury; not every offensive touch or argument is this felony. A third-degree felony ordinarily carries 2–10 years in prison and may also carry a fine up to $10,000. A distinctive uniform or badge indicating the worker’s role supports a statutory knowledge presumption, not automatic guilt. Assault enhancement and uniform rule; Underlying assault elements; Ordinary felony range; Limits on presumptions.
Harassment becomes a Class A rather than the ordinary Class B misdemeanor when the defendant knows or reasonably should know the victim is a covered utility worker performing duties. The prosecution still must establish the harassment offense; SB482 does not make every complaint to a utility criminal. A Class A misdemeanor ordinarily permits up to one year in jail, a fine up to $4,000, or both. Harassment enhancement; Harassment elements; Class A punishment.
Interference with a utility employee or agent performing duties is added to Section 38.15. It requires criminal negligence—failure to perceive a substantial, unjustifiable risk that grossly departs from ordinary care—not simply any inconvenience. The base offense remains a Class B misdemeanor, ordinarily up to 180 days in jail, a fine up to $2,000, or both. The existing defense when the alleged interference consists of speech only remains intact. Interference provision; Criminal negligence; Base penalty and speech-only defense; Class B punishment.
The assault and harassment definition lists specified electric, telecommunications, cable/video and gas utilities, oil/gas-related pipelines, electric cooperatives and municipally owned utilities. The interference definition separately adds broadband providers and retail water or sewer utility service. The definitions are not identical; coverage depends on the listed statutory categories, not simply whether an employer is commonly called a utility. Two different utility definitions.
The act also adds all Section 38.15 offenses—not only those involving utility workers—to the existing disaster/evacuation-area penalty rule. When its conditions are proved, a Class B interference offense receives Class A punishment. Bodily-injury assault was already on that list, so a qualifying third-degree assault can receive second-degree punishment. Harassment is not added to that disaster list. Separately, existing Section 12.501 can impose a 180-day minimum for qualifying Class A harassment involving known public-servant status and retaliation for or on account of that status or service; utility employment alone does not establish those conditions. Amended disaster-offense list; Existing disaster-area rule; Separate public-servant retaliation rule.
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill and Senate committee text limited the new assault and harassment enhancements to disaster or evacuated areas and proposed exceptions to further punishment increases. Alvarado’s adopted Senate amendment removed both the geographic limits and those proposed exceptions. The engrossed bill therefore protected covered workers performing duties outside disasters too. Introduced text; Complete Senate amendment.
The House committee substitute added the distinctive-uniform-or-badge knowledge presumption for assault. Hull’s adopted House amendment then added interference with utility duties, the broader utility definition for that offense, and Section 38.15 to the disaster-area penalty list. Those changes survived enrollment; the Senate concurred May 22. House substitute; Complete House amendment; All five versions; Amendment dispositions.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
The law seeks to protect workers carrying out utility services through stronger criminal consequences. It does not establish compensation for injured workers, guarantee faster restoration or demonstrate that assaults will decline. Expanded offenses and penalties may also increase prosecution, supervision and confinement demands. Enacted provisions.
All five indexed fiscal postings and four criminal-justice impact statements were reviewed. The final May 20 fiscal note says state and local correctional costs cannot be determined because the frequency of affected conduct is unknown. The final impact statement reports 21,225 fiscal-2024 misdemeanor-assault arrests as background; that is not a count of utility-worker assaults or a forecast of new convictions. Final fiscal posting; Final criminal-justice impact statement.
The fiscal descriptions are not substitutes for the legal conditions: the earlier notes associate a 180-day harassment minimum with disaster areas, while the final note refers to public servants. The enacted text does not add harassment to Section 12.50. Any separate public-servant enhancement must satisfy Section 12.501, including its knowledge and retaliation/service-status requirements. Controlling enacted text; Disaster list; Public-servant conditions.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.