2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB494

SB494 requires the Railroad Commission of Texas to appoint a task force on petroleum-product theft.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the establishment of a theft of petroleum products task force.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Sparks. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB494 requires the Railroad Commission of Texas to appoint a task force on petroleum-product theft. Its job is to study the problem and recommend prevention measures, not to create a new police force or criminal penalty. Membership must include at least one oil-and-gas industry representative, at least one energy-trade-association representative and representatives of local, state and federal law enforcement. The commission chooses the presiding officer. Task force and membership.

The task force must meet at least quarterly and may meet online. It must examine other jurisdictions’ laws, sales-tax effects, long-term economic impacts and the advantages and disadvantages of possible responses. Recommendations must address prevention and outreach, coordination, and training for law-enforcement officers and prosecutors. Members may consult organizations, governments and people they consider necessary. Study duties.

Reports are due by December 1 of every even-numbered year to state leaders, the commission and legislative committees with primary oil-and-gas jurisdiction. They must include legislative and other recommendations on transparency, security, consumer protection, prevention and long-term economic effects. Signed May 20, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025, required appointments as soon as practicable and expires December 31, 2030. The first statutory report deadline after effectiveness is December 1, 2026. History; Reporting and expiration.

The act defines the theft it studies by reference to Penal Code Section 31.19. It exempts only the task force’s duration and choice of presiding officer from Government Code Chapter 2110—not every requirement of that chapter. This briefing describes the legal duties, not a finding that appointments or reports have already been completed. Definition and limited exception.

What changed along the way?

The introduced, Senate committee, engrossed and House committee versions also would have allowed task-force members to share information about active criminal investigations with one another even when otherwise confidential under the Public Information Act. Landgraf’s sole indexed House amendment removed that provision and retained the permission to consult. It was adopted April 30; the Senate concurred May 7. The confidentiality override is not in the enacted law. Pre-amendment House text; Complete adopted amendment; All versions; Amendment index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

The task force can give lawmakers and agencies a shared assessment and prevention recommendations. Whether theft declines depends on later implementation and enforcement; the act does not itself guarantee recoveries, increase theft sentences or appropriate a new enforcement fund. Study rather than new criminal penalties.

The March 4 introduced, April 11 engrossed and May 1 House-passed fiscal notes—including the duplicate final posting—anticipate no significant state or local fiscal impact and assume costs can be absorbed using existing resources. They do not calculate stolen-product losses or predict savings from the task force. Final fiscal posting.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.