← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB541
SB541 expands what Texas home-based food businesses may sell and creates a limited route for resale through cottage-food vendors.
Official caption: Relating to cottage food production operations.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Kolkhorst. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB541 expands what Texas home-based food businesses may sell and creates a limited route for resale through cottage-food vendors.
- Foods needing temperature control have extra conditions: For otherwise allowed foods that need time and temperature control for safety, direct sellers must register with the Department of State Health Services, store and deliver food at temperatures necessary to prevent illness-causing bacterial growth, and follow labeling requirements.
- Food must be packaged to prevent contamination, with an exception for items too large or bulky for conventional packaging.
- A cottage-food vendor must be located in Texas, have a contract with the producer, and sell non-temperature-controlled cottage foods directly to Texas consumers on the producer’s behalf.
- Online purchases still require personal delivery, now by the operator, an employee or a household member.
- Local authorities cannot regulate cottage-food production or require the prohibited licenses, permits or fees for the covered production, sales and consumer sampling.
What does it do?
SB541 expands what Texas home-based food businesses may sell and creates a limited route for resale through cottage-food vendors. It replaces the old list of permitted foods with a broader rule, but still excludes meat and poultry products; seafood; ice and ice products, including ice cream; low-acid canned goods; products containing CBD or THC; and raw milk and raw-milk products. The operation may be an individual working at home or a qualifying 501(c)(3) nonprofit working at a director’s or officer’s home. The annual limit rises from $50,000 to $150,000 in gross food-sales income, with annual CPI-U inflation adjustments—not $150,000 in profit or a permanently fixed ceiling. Final law, Sections 1–2.
Foods needing temperature control have extra conditions. For otherwise allowed foods that need time and temperature control for safety, direct sellers must register with the Department of State Health Services, store and deliver food at temperatures necessary to prevent illness-causing bacterial growth, and follow labeling requirements. These foods cannot be wholesaled through cottage-food vendors. Being allowed to use an ingredient does not by itself make the finished product exempt from temperature-control requirements. Definitions and Sections 6–7.
Food must be packaged to prevent contamination, with an exception for items too large or bulky for conventional packaging. Labels identify the operation and state: “THIS PRODUCT WAS PRODUCED IN A PRIVATE RESIDENCE THAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO GOVERNMENTAL LICENSING OR INSPECTION.” Registration allows a department-issued unique number to replace the home address, not the operation’s name. Temperature-controlled foods need a date-made label and the specified safe-handling statement in at least 12-point type on the label, invoice or receipt. Section 5 labeling provisions.
A cottage-food vendor must be located in Texas, have a contract with the producer, and sell non-temperature-controlled cottage foods directly to Texas consumers on the producer’s behalf. Vendors may sell at farmers’ markets, farm stands, food-service establishments and retail stores. They must display the private-residence disclosure and use date-made labels; vendors buying wholesale must register. The producer receives an exemption from the state food-manufacturer licensing requirements for this wholesale activity. This is not unrestricted wholesale permission for any food or buyer. Sections 1, 3, 6 and 7.
Online purchases still require personal delivery, now by the operator, an employee or a household member. Required labeling information must appear on the operation’s website before payment, with the address or registered identification number on the delivered label; the home address need not be displayed before payment. The act removes the mail-order wording—it does not authorize mailing food or delivery by any unrelated courier. Producers may offer samples anywhere in Texas under the incorporated sanitary safeguards and donate non-temperature-controlled foods for event sale or service to the same extent individuals may. Sales, samples and donations.
Local authorities cannot regulate cottage-food production or require the prohibited licenses, permits or fees for the covered production, sales and consumer sampling. A local authority may not employ or continue to employ someone who knowingly requires or attempts to require a prohibited license or permit. State registration requirements still apply where specified. Signed May 30, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025. Sections 4 and 9; Official history.
What changed along the way?
The introduced and Senate versions proposed a $100,000 ceiling and a narrower expansion, including temperature-controlled baked goods while excluding baked goods from the proposed vendor definition. The House substitute instead used the broader “any food except” list, retained the proposed nonprofit eligibility, added annual inflation adjustments and developed the final registration, vendor, labeling and local-enforcement framework. Non-temperature-controlled baked goods are not categorically excluded from vendor sales in the final act. Introduced proposal; House substitute; All versions.
Both indexed House floor amendments were adopted May 12 and survived in the enrolled law. Hull’s amendment clarified that protected sampling is to consumers and tied vendor sales to the wholesale-food restrictions. Harless’s amendment raised the House substitute’s $100,000 ceiling to $150,000. The Senate concurred May 20. Hull amendment; Harless amendment; Complete amendment index.
The act removes the old general prohibition on temperature-controlled cottage foods and the separate frozen-fruit/vegetable temperature and warning provisions, replacing them with the broader safety framework. Existing food-handler training, complaint records and emergency powers for immediate serious health threats remain. Special recipe-or-testing and batch-record requirements for pickled produce, fermented vegetables and plant-based acidified canned goods also remain; the statutory pickled-cucumber exception is not permission to sell prohibited low-acid canned goods. Repeals and new requirements; DSHS guidance on continuing requirements.
A drafting caveat: Section 6 literally refers to “437.002(2-b)(A)(i)-(vi),” although the six food exclusions are in Section 437.001, not 437.002. This briefing does not silently change that reference or claim a court has resolved it. The definition enacted in Section 1 excludes those foods, and DSHS guidance repeats the exclusions and says temperature-controlled foods are ineligible for wholesale. Enrolled wording; Agency implementation guidance.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Home producers and qualifying nonprofits gain a larger sales ceiling and more permitted products; eligible vendors gain a resale channel. Registering for an identification number offers an alternative to publishing a home address on labels. Potential gains depend on actual demand, safe production and compliance—not an income guarantee. Producers and vendors bear applicable registration, labeling, storage and delivery duties; consumers receive disclosures but not routine government inspection of these home operations. Emergency health action remains available. Permissions and duties; DSHS explanation of inspection exemption and emergency authority.
The final May 14 fiscal note anticipates no significant state fiscal impact and assumes state costs can be absorbed with existing resources. It says local fiscal effects cannot be determined—not that local costs are zero. Earlier fiscal notes discuss potential insignificant license-revenue losses as some businesses leave food-manufacturer licensing. The notes do not measure individual business profits, consumer prices or foodborne-illness outcomes. Final fiscal note; Earlier fiscal estimate.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.