← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB646
SB646 broadens mental-health professional student-loan repayment and raises the statutory assistance limits, subject to available funding and service requirements.
Official caption: Relating to repayment of certain mental health professional education loans.
Official report lists Senate author(s): West. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB646 broadens mental-health professional student-loan repayment and raises the statutory assistance limits, subject to available funding and service requirements.
- The regular route requires one, two or three consecutive years in a state-designated mental-health shortage area serving Medicaid, CHIP or the specified juvenile/adult correctional populations.
- The base limits rise from $160,000 to $180,000 for physicians with the specified psychiatric residency or board certification; $80,000 to $100,000 for psychologists and specified doctoral-level clinical social workers, professional counselors and marriage/family therapists; $60,000 to $80,000 for advanced practice registered nurses with nationally recognized psychiatric or mental-health nursing board certification; and $40,000 to $60,000 for the other specified licensed clinicians and school-psychology practitioners.
- Additional assistance is specified as $5,000 once for fluency in a locally needed language determined by the board, $10,000 once for practice in a county of 150,000 people or fewer, and $15,000 for each fourth and fifth consecutive qualifying service year.
- Signed June 22, 2025, the act took effect September 1.
What does it do?
SB646 broadens mental-health professional student-loan repayment and raises the statutory assistance limits, subject to available funding and service requirements. It adds licensed master social workers, professional counselor associates, marriage and family therapist associates, and certified school counselors with at least a counseling-related master’s degree from a public or accredited private institution. It also adds service to Texas public-school students to the alternative eligibility route alongside state-hospital and local mental-health-authority services. Applicants must apply and complete qualifying consecutive service; a professional title alone does not guarantee an award. Sections 1–2.
The regular route requires one, two or three consecutive years in a state-designated mental-health shortage area serving Medicaid, CHIP or the specified juvenile/adult correctional populations. The alternative route requires one, two or three consecutive years of the listed Texas services, without that shortage-area condition. The act retains 33.33% of the applicable base amount for each of the first three eligible years. Sections 2 and 4.
The base limits rise from $160,000 to $180,000 for physicians with the specified psychiatric residency or board certification; $80,000 to $100,000 for psychologists and specified doctoral-level clinical social workers, professional counselors and marriage/family therapists; $60,000 to $80,000 for advanced practice registered nurses with nationally recognized psychiatric or mental-health nursing board certification; and $40,000 to $60,000 for the other specified licensed clinicians and school-psychology practitioners. The newly added professions also fall in the $60,000 tier. Chemical-dependency counselors have a new $50,000 tier if their license and most recent qualifying degree were received within the same 12-month period; otherwise the qualifying associate-degree-or-higher tier rises from $10,000 to $15,000. These are base program limits, not annual salaries or universal annual awards. Section 61.607(b).
Additional assistance is specified as $5,000 once for fluency in a locally needed language determined by the board, $10,000 once for practice in a county of 150,000 people or fewer, and $15,000 for each fourth and fifth consecutive qualifying service year. But all base and additional assistance combined is capped at 110% of the profession’s base limit. Thus a $60,000-tier participant’s overall statutory ceiling is $66,000—not $60,000 plus every advertised bonus. Available funds and qualifying loans also constrain payment. Sections 61.607(b-1)–(b-2); Retained funding limits.
Signed June 22, 2025, the act took effect September 1. Its eligibility and amount changes apply to people first establishing eligibility on an application submitted on or after that date; people whose first eligibility rests on an earlier application remain under the former law. Allocation changes start with the fiscal year beginning September 1, 2025. Sections 7–8; History.
What changed along the way?
The introduced, Senate committee, engrossed, House committee and enrolled operative texts are identical. The history records a corrected committee report but no substantive textual change in the posted versions; the amendment index lists none. All the expansions, bonuses and the 110% ceiling were in the introduced bill. Introduced text; Versions; Amendment index.
The act consolidates three 2023 versions of the eligibility section. Earlier law already included a narrower school-psychology service route; SB646 is not the first school-related eligibility provision. It also removes the rule restricting marriage/family therapists to leftover funding and repeals the old leftover-fund priority arrangement. The new unused-fund authority can serve any listed profession notwithstanding the 30% per-profession grant-count limit; it does not waive the retained 10% limit for correctional-service grants. Earlier school-service route; Former allocation restrictions; Sections 2–3 and 6.
A separate 2025 act, HB2598, renames the school-psychology credential “school psychologist.” SB646 still uses “licensed specialist in school psychology” in its enrolled text; that terminology does not create a new, unlicensed profession. The limits described here are SB646’s changes, not a claim that its text is the only 2025 amendment to the program. HB2598 title changes; SB646.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
More early-career and school-based professionals can qualify, and larger limits or service incentives may help recruit or retain providers. Those outcomes depend on funding and participation; the act does not prove that shortages will shrink. Existing law excludes loans in default at application and ties payments to eligible education loans. The board may adjust annual distributions to stay within available program funds, so a statutory ceiling is not a promised check. Expanded eligibility and incentives; Eligible-loan restrictions; Funding ceiling and adjustment authority.
The board may use up to $1 million of money appropriated for the program for marketing, including through a contractor; SB646 does not itself appropriate that $1 million. The sole posted fiscal note, dated April 9 for the unchanged introduced text, anticipates no significant state or local fiscal impact and assumes costs can be absorbed with existing resources. It gives no quantified workforce benefit or guarantee that every eligible applicant will receive the maximum. Marketing authority; Fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.