2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB650
SB650, the Deshawn Jagwan Act, requires visual ID inspection and electronic age verification for covered alcohol sales for off-premises consumption.
Official caption: Relating to requiring the use of electronically readable information to verify a purchaser's age in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages.
Official report lists Senate author(s): West. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB650, the Deshawn Jagwan Act, requires visual ID inspection and electronic age verification for covered alcohol sales for off-premises consumption.
- Exceptions cover sales on the premises of distillers/rectifiers, wineries, brewers, brewpubs and mixed-beverage permit holders; restaurants and the specified food-and-beverage-certificate restaurants; authorized sellers at qualifying entertainment-facility events; the specified wine-shipping and licensed delivery arrangements; and outdoor pickup on the retailer’s premises of manufacturer-sealed containers for off-premises consumption.
- Three agency-discipline protections must be kept separate.
- The section retains its Class A misdemeanor provision and adds defenses specifically to prosecution for failure to access the electronic information: a preventing internet/data connectivity problem, or a purchaser who was at least 40 on the purchase date.
- The bill became law without the governor’s signature on June 22, 2025, and took effect September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
SB650, the Deshawn Jagwan Act, requires visual ID inspection and electronic age verification for covered alcohol sales for off-premises consumption. The sale must occur on licensed or permitted premises. If the driver’s license, commercial driver’s license or identification certificate cannot be scanned, its information may be manually entered into an electronic reader. This is not a universal scanning rule for every bar, restaurant or alcohol transaction. Section 109.61(a-1).
Exceptions cover sales on the premises of distillers/rectifiers, wineries, brewers, brewpubs and mixed-beverage permit holders; restaurants and the specified food-and-beverage-certificate restaurants; authorized sellers at qualifying entertainment-facility events; the specified wine-shipping and licensed delivery arrangements; and outdoor pickup on the retailer’s premises of manufacturer-sealed containers for off-premises consumption. The final law does not retain a blanket package-store exception. Complete list of exceptions.
Three agency-discipline protections must be kept separate. A connectivity failure is protected when the seller visually checks the listed ID. A covered license or permit holder is protected from agency discipline for a sale to a minor when the required electronic access was performed and the device identified the ID as valid and the purchaser as at least 21. And the commission may not discipline a holder for violating the new checking requirement in sales made before September 1, 2027. That last provision expires September 1, 2028. These protections address agency discipline, not blanket immunity from every lawsuit or criminal charge. Sections 109.61(a-2)–(a-4).
The section retains its Class A misdemeanor provision and adds defenses specifically to prosecution for failure to access the electronic information: a preventing internet/data connectivity problem, or a purchaser who was at least 40 on the purchase date. Age 40 is a defense to that charge, not a general exemption written into the scanning duty. The final law also prohibits retaining information accessed under the section, removing the former commission-required-retention exception. Sections 109.61(b), (d) and (d-1); Earlier retention and offense provisions.
The bill became law without the governor’s signature on June 22, 2025, and took effect September 1, 2025. Implementing rules are due by September 1, 2027. The act’s effective date is not postponed to 2027: the temporary protection concerns the specified agency discipline, and does not expressly postpone the criminal provisions. History; Sections 3–4 and temporary protection.
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill broadly required electronic checking for retail alcohol sales. The Senate committee added a package-store exception. West’s adopted March 26 floor amendment added visual inspection, manual entry, connectivity protections, the age-40 criminal defense and the act’s name, and replaced the package-store exception with a restaurant-certificate exception. The engrossed text also removed the former retention exception. Introduced; Senate committee; Senate floor amendment; Engrossed text.
The House substitute narrowed the mandate to off-premises consumption, supplied the broader exception list—including package stores at that stage—and added the successful-scan protection against agency discipline for selling to a minor. Bowers’s adopted May 21 amendment added the licensed/permitted-premises condition. House substitute; House amendment; Both amendment outcomes.
Conference retained the House framework but removed the package-store exception. Both chambers expressly authorized that change through resolutions allowing the conference committee to go outside its usual limits, then adopted the report June 1. The enrolled law matches that result. Senate resolution 706; House resolution 1499; Final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Covered retailers may need readers, staff training and checkout procedures; customers may face an additional ID check. The checks could help detect underage purchasers, while the retention prohibition protects customer information. The exceptions, manual-entry option and connectivity defenses limit some burdens. The act does not quantify prevented underage sales or establish that a successful scan always proves identity. Requirements and safeguards.
All seven posted fiscal-note versions anticipate no significant state or local fiscal impact, with agency costs absorbed using existing resources. The final May 31 conference note does not price retailers’ equipment, training or transaction delays, so that public-budget estimate is not a finding that compliance is free. SB650 provides no equipment appropriation. Final fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.