2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB763

SB763 requires the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to review the protectiveness of specified permanent-concrete-plant standard permits at least once every eight years.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to standard permits for certain concrete plants.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Alvarado. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB763 requires the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to review the protectiveness of specified permanent-concrete-plant standard permits at least once every eight years. It concerns permits under Health and Safety Code 382.05195 for permanent plants performing wet batching, dry batching or central mixing. It is a review of the standard permit, not a new eight-year inspection or renewal mandate for each individual plant. Signed June 20, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025 and required implementing rules by March 1, 2026. Final law; History.

If that review leads to an amended permit, existing authorized facilities may keep operating under the old permit until the commission’s specified compliance date, which must give operators a reasonable time to comply. The act does not automatically close plants when a review occurs or prescribe a particular new emissions limit. New subsection (e-1); Existing permit and compliance framework.

The act also makes clear that applications for authorization to use the standard permit must contain the specified plot plan. That requirement covers permanent, temporary and specialty concrete batch plants and lists a scale, north arrow, property and equipment locations, at least two benchmark locations and any required setback/distance compliance. Those plan details already appeared in the statute; SB763 changes the application wording rather than imposing a new universal setback distance. The eight-year review provision itself is limited to the specified permanent plants. Amended subsection (k); Prior plot-plan requirements.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill proposed a six-year review of the standard permit and of each authorization, and also proposed changes to the separate permit law in Section 382.05198. The Senate substitute removed the individual-authorization renewal reviews and the separate Section 382.05198 changes, but retained a six-year standard-permit review including available background pollution concentrations. Introduced; Senate substitute; Separate concrete-plant permit statute.

The House substitute changed six years to ten and removed the express background-concentration language. The conference compromise changed ten years to eight without restoring that language. The conference text and side-by-side comparison were read and checked against the enrolled act; both chambers adopted the report May 31. No separate floor amendments are listed in the amendment index—the material changes were in committee substitutes and conference. House substitute; Conference report and comparison; Amendment index; Enrolled eight-year requirement.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Neighbors gain a recurring review requirement for the covered standard permits; operators gain explicit time to adjust if the permit changes. The final law requires a protectiveness review but does not dictate its outcome or guarantee an emissions reduction. The removed six-year authorization-review and express background-pollution provisions are not new requirements under this act. Final scope; Compromise comparison.

All six available fiscal-note versions were reviewed. The May 30 conference note anticipates no significant state or local-government fiscal impact and assumes state costs can be absorbed using existing resources. It supplies no dollar estimate for plant upgrades, household health benefits or compliance savings. Conference fiscal note; All fiscal versions.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.