2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB835
SB835, called Trey’s Law, makes contract terms unenforceable to the extent they bar disclosure of covered sexual abuse or related facts.
Official caption: Relating to the enforceability of certain nondisclosure or confidentiality provisions with respect to an act of sexual abuse.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Paxton. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB835, called Trey’s Law, makes contract terms unenforceable to the extent they bar disclosure of covered sexual abuse or related facts.
- The law uses specified legal definitions rather than covering every dispute described informally as abuse.
- The restriction is limited to the prohibited disclosure clause; it does not automatically void the entire settlement or require a survivor to speak publicly.
- The act reaches agreements signed before, on or after September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
SB835, called Trey’s Law, makes contract terms unenforceable to the extent they bar disclosure of covered sexual abuse or related facts. It covers nondisclosure/confidentiality agreements and such clauses in employment, settlement or other agreements. The protection extends to disclosure by a person, including a party, to any other person—not just to police. The governor signed it June 20, 2025; it took effect September 1, 2025. Final law; History.
The law uses specified legal definitions rather than covering every dispute described informally as abuse. It includes indecency with a child, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, sexual performance by a child, specified sex-trafficking conduct and compelling prostitution. It also incorporates listed Family Code child-abuse acts and omissions, including harmful sexual conduct, failure to make reasonable efforts to prevent it, and specified sexual exploitation and child trafficking. That child-trafficking reference includes forced-labor trafficking as well as sexual trafficking. Coverage is not limited to child victims or to the direct perpetrator’s conduct. Section 129C.001; Family Code 261.001(1)(E)–(H), (K)–(L); Referenced trafficking conduct.
The restriction is limited to the prohibited disclosure clause; it does not automatically void the entire settlement or require a survivor to speak publicly. Parties may still agree to keep other settlement terms confidential, expressly including the amount and payment terms. SB835 does not itself promise immunity from unrelated laws or decide whether a particular allegation is true. Section 129C.002.
The act reaches agreements signed before, on or after September 1, 2025. For an earlier agreement, someone seeking to enforce or attempt to enforce a covered agreement or clause must first obtain a declaratory judgment declaring it enforceable that is final and no longer appealable. This is a court ruling about legal rights; the prerequisite is placed on the person trying to enforce the clause, not a blanket requirement that every survivor first sue. Section 3; Declaratory judgments.
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill focused on sexual abuse committed against children and separately addressed reports to authorities and disclosure of related facts, including an alleged offender’s identity. The Senate committee substitute removed the child-only limitation, used the broader disclosure-to-any-person language, expressly preserved confidentiality of other settlement terms, added the final-court-ruling condition for preexisting agreements and named the act Trey’s Law.
The official index lists no floor amendments. All five indexed versions were compared; the substitute, engrossed, House committee and enrolled operative texts match. These changes were committee-substitute changes, not floor amendments.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
People with information about covered abuse gain protection against contractual silence requirements. Employers, institutions and settlement parties can no longer rely on the prohibited clauses as written and may face court proceedings over earlier agreements. The law preserves the option to keep settlement amounts and payment schedules confidential; it does not award compensation, guarantee a particular court result or require disclosure of all settlement details. Scope and limits.
Both fiscal notes were read. The May 13 substitute note anticipated no significant state or local fiscal impact and assumed costs could be absorbed using existing resources. The May 8 introduced note reached the same government-budget conclusion for the narrower proposal. Neither quantifies private litigation costs, settlement changes or individual compensation.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.