← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB840
SB840 requires qualifying large cities to allow more apartments and residential mixed-use projects in commercial areas and limits restrictions on converting older commercial buildings to housing.
Official caption: Relating to certain municipal regulation of certain mixed-use and multifamily residential development projects and conversion of certain commercial buildings to mixed-use and multifamily residential occupancy.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Hughes. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB840 requires qualifying large cities to allow more apartments and residential mixed-use projects in commercial areas and limits restrictions on converting older commercial buildings to housing.
- Covered cities must allow these residential uses in zoning categories allowing office, commercial, retail, warehouse or mixed-use development, without requiring rezoning or the listed discretionary exceptions and approvals.
- The development rules prevent cities from setting a density cap below the greater of 36 dwellings per acre or the highest residential density they allow; a height cap below the greater of 45 feet or the highest height allowed for the listed commercial uses on that site; or a setback/buffer requirement more restrictive than the lesser of 25 feet or the comparable commercial requirement.
- The separate conversion protections cover office, retail or warehouse buildings at least five years old at the proposed conversion start.
- The act preserves short-term-rental rules, state/federal water-quality protections, voluntary density-bonus programs and generally applicable stormwater and historic-preservation rules.
- The zoning/development subchapter applies to projects initiated on or after September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
SB840 requires qualifying large cities to allow more apartments and residential mixed-use projects in commercial areas and limits restrictions on converting older commercial buildings to housing. It applies only to municipalities with more than 150,000 people that lie wholly or partly in a county with more than 300,000. Signed June 20, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025. Final act; History.
Covered cities must allow these residential uses in zoning categories allowing office, commercial, retail, warehouse or mixed-use development, without requiring rezoning or the listed discretionary exceptions and approvals. This particular use-permission rule excludes heavy-industrial zones, land within 1,000 feet of an existing heavy-industrial site, land within 3,000 feet of an airport or military base, and designated clear or accident-potential zones. Those exclusions are written for Section 218.101, not as an exemption from the entire chapter. Multifamily means at least three dwellings in one or more buildings; residential mixed-use requires at least 65% residential floor area. Both can include condominiums. Definitions and Section 218.101.
The development rules prevent cities from setting a density cap below the greater of 36 dwellings per acre or the highest residential density they allow; a height cap below the greater of 45 feet or the highest height allowed for the listed commercial uses on that site; or a setback/buffer requirement more restrictive than the lesser of 25 feet or the comparable commercial requirement. Cities cannot require more than one parking space per dwelling or a multilevel garage, impose a floor-area-to-lot-area ratio restriction, or require nonresidential uses in a multifamily project outside a mixed-use zone. When the permitting authority finds the project meets compliant municipal land-development rules, approval must be administrative, without further city-council action. These are limits on what cities may require—not a command that every project be built to those dimensions. Section 218.102.
The separate conversion protections cover office, retail or warehouse buildings at least five years old at the proposed conversion start. Conversion to residential mixed-use or multifamily occupancy must cover at least 65% of the building and at least 65% of each occupiable floor. Cities cannot demand a traffic-impact study, traffic-mitigation improvements or fees, extra parking beyond existing spaces, utility upgrades beyond the minimum capacity needed, or design standards stricter than the applicable minimum International Building Code standard adopted under state law. New impact fees are barred unless the land was already subject to an impact fee before the conversion building permit was filed. This is not a waiver of every permit fee or parkland requirement. Sections 218.201–218.204; Building-code framework; Impact-fee definition.
The act preserves short-term-rental rules, state/federal water-quality protections, voluntary density-bonus programs and generally applicable stormwater and historic-preservation rules. Generally applicable water/sewer-access requirements and building codes also remain, subject to the chapter’s specific limits. A qualifying housing organization or another person adversely affected or aggrieved may sue the city for a declaration of rights or an order stopping or correcting a violation. A prevailing claimant must receive court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. Suit belongs where the property is located; the Fifteenth Court of Appeals handles intermediate appeals. The final act does not include the earlier economic-damages remedy or express immunity waivers. Sections 218.003 and 218.301.
The zoning/development subchapter applies to projects initiated on or after September 1, 2025. The conversion subchapter applies when the conversion building permit was submitted on or after that date. The impact-fee conforming amendment preserves the existing prohibition on roadway impact fees outside city limits in the city’s extraterritorial jurisdiction; it does not newly invent that prohibition. Sections 3–5; Pre-effective-date fee rule.
What changed along the way?
The introduced proposal also covered counties and used different population thresholds. The Senate committee substitute narrowed the regulated governments to cities, added the heavy-industry definition and exclusions, preserved specified local powers, and removed the proposed attorney-general enforcement mechanism that could restrict local property-tax rates for three years. That tax-rate penalty did not become law.
All three indexed floor amendments were adopted and survive: Senate F1 (Bettencourt, March 24) raised the city threshold from more than 90,000 to more than 150,000; Senate F2 (Alvarado, March 24) removed the proposed official-immunity waiver for municipal officers and employees; House H31 (Hefner, May 21) added the preserved generally applicable water/sewer, building-code, stormwater and historic-preservation powers.
The House committee text expanded the airport/military buffer to 3,000 feet and added clear/accident-potential zones. It removed proposed blanket conversion permit-fee and parkland-dedication/fee prohibitions, economic damages, municipal-officer defendants and the express municipal governmental-immunity waiver. The five official versions were read and compared through enrollment; the House floor amendment supplies the remaining change from House committee text to final law. The Senate concurred May 26. Deleted proposals should not be mistaken for final protections.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Developers and owners of qualifying commercial property gain a less discretionary path to housing construction and conversion, potentially lowering approval, parking and conversion costs. Cities lose some control over permitted uses and project dimensions but retain the specified safety, infrastructure and preservation rules. More housing is possible, not guaranteed: financing, building suitability, demand and remaining legal requirements still matter. The act sets no guaranteed rent reduction or affordable-unit quota. Enacted requirements and exceptions.
All six fiscal-note versions were reviewed. The May 21 note for the bill as passed the second house expects no significant state fiscal effect and says implementation can use existing resources. It notes that development changes could affect taxable property values and state school-finance costs, but not significantly; local effects are possible for municipalities whose current regulations conflict with the bill. The note does not quantify those local effects or private savings. Litigation and compliance may impose costs even though no significant state fiscal impact was projected.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.