2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB842

SB842 gives ringside physicians civil-liability protection for acts within their responsibilities at a combative-sports event, but not for acts or omissions constituting gross negligence.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to immunity for ringside physicians assigned to combative sports events.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Schwertner. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB842 gives ringside physicians civil-liability protection for acts within their responsibilities at a combative-sports event, but not for acts or omissions constituting gross negligence. It was signed and took effect May 24, 2025, after receiving the votes required for immediate effect. Final act; History.

The existing definition covers a person with an unrestricted, unlimited Texas medical license who is assigned by agreement as physician for the event. Combative sports include full-contact boxing, kickboxing, martial arts and mixed martial arts under the statutory definition; specified recreational, partial-contact student training and exhibitions are excluded. This is protection for the assigned physician’s event responsibilities, not immunity for every doctor, promoter, referee or injury connected to a fight. Existing definitions.

The exception preserves civil claims arising from grossly negligent acts or omissions. The act does not excuse criminal conduct or remove medical-licensing obligations: its protection is expressly from civil liability. It also does not change the existing physician-examination and ringside-presence requirements for regulated amateur events. New Section 2052.255; Existing amateur-event safeguards.

The new section applies only to lawsuits commenced on or after May 24, 2025. The transition is keyed to when the action starts, not stated as a rule limited to injuries occurring after that date. Sections 2–3.

What changed along the way?

All five official text versions were read and compared. The introduced, Senate committee, engrossed, House committee and enrolled operative provisions are the same: scope-of-responsibility civil immunity, a gross-negligence exception, and the action-commencement transition. The index lists no amendments; no proposed amendment was added to the final explanation.

The final certification records Senate passage 31–0 and House passage 141–1, satisfying the two-thirds requirement for immediate effect. The September 1 alternative printed in the bill did not become its operative start date. Effective-date clause and certified votes.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Assigned ringside physicians gain protection against covered civil claims, which may reduce liability concerns about staffing events. Injured participants lose access to some ordinary-negligence claims against those physicians, but the law does not shield gross negligence or conduct outside the protected responsibilities. It does not guarantee additional doctors, safer bouts or lower insurance premiums. Protection and exception.

The sole indexed February 17 fiscal note anticipates no significant state fiscal impact, assumes any state costs can be absorbed with existing resources, and anticipates no local-government fiscal impact. The operative bill did not change after that note. It contains no estimate of private insurance savings or the effect on injured participants’ recoveries.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.