2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB843
SB843 directs the Texas Education Agency to maintain a database of school bonds, taxes and bond-funded projects, including specified charter-school bond information.
Official caption: Relating to a Texas Education Agency database of school district and open-enrollment charter school bonds, taxes, and bond-related projects.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Kolkhorst. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB843 directs the Texas Education Agency to maintain a database of school bonds, taxes and bond-funded projects, including specified charter-school bond information.
- For each school-district bond planned, proposed or issued, the database must include ballot wording, the projected debt-service tax rate, election results, planned projects, an accounting of proceeds and projects paid for, capital-project funding sources, costs, budget and size, and resulting increases in the debt-service tax rate. “Interest and sinking fund” means the bond-payment side of the tax information, distinct from the maintenance tax used for school operations.
- For bonds issued for open-enrollment charter schools, including designated charter districts, the specified entries are the project list and an accounting of proceeds and projects paid for.
- Districts and covered charter schools must supply the listed information and other information the agency requests for the database.
- The agency must transmit the information to the Bond Review Board to satisfy Government Code Section 1231.025 reporting requirements.
What does it do?
SB843 directs the Texas Education Agency to maintain a database of school bonds, taxes and bond-funded projects, including specified charter-school bond information. Implementation is mandatory only if the Legislature specifically appropriates money for it; otherwise the agency may use other available money but is not required to do so. The act itself appropriates no money. Signed June 20, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025. Final act; History.
For each school-district bond planned, proposed or issued, the database must include ballot wording, the projected debt-service tax rate, election results, planned projects, an accounting of proceeds and projects paid for, capital-project funding sources, costs, budget and size, and resulting increases in the debt-service tax rate. “Interest and sinking fund” means the bond-payment side of the tax information, distinct from the maintenance tax used for school operations. The database also covers proposed or approved maintenance-tax rates and ballot language, plus voter-approval tax-election results and the proposed rate. Section 45.114(b)(1), (3) and (4); Bond taxes; Maintenance taxes.
For bonds issued for open-enrollment charter schools, including designated charter districts, the specified entries are the project list and an accounting of proceeds and projects paid for. The bill does not give charter schools new taxing authority or require them to conduct school-district tax elections. A charter district here is the existing bond-guarantee designation, not a new kind of taxing district. Section 45.114(a)–(b); Charter-district designation.
Districts and covered charter schools must supply the listed information and other information the agency requests for the database. It must let the agency generate geographically separated reports and allow proposed updates or corrections. The agency may contract for development or maintenance; the education commissioner may adopt implementing rules. The act does not itself specify a public-facing search website or a deadline by which the database must be online. Section 45.114(b)–(f).
The agency must transmit the information to the Bond Review Board to satisfy Government Code Section 1231.025 reporting requirements. That linked section was added separately by HB3526, effective September 1, 2025; it covers local bond-election information before and after the election and publication of election results. SB843 supplies the education-agency transmission rule, not the entire underlying reporting law. Section 45.114(e); Referenced reporting section as of September 1, 2025.
What changed along the way?
All five official versions were read and compared. The Senate committee substitute expanded the introduced bill’s bond coverage to include planned bonds and added detailed capital-project data. The engrossed and House committee operative texts match.
All three indexed amendments were adopted and remain in the final act: Kolkhorst’s Senate F1 (April 24) added the specific-appropriation condition; Bettencourt’s Senate F2 (April 24) added charter schools and the corresponding bond/project reporting; Capriglione’s House amendment (May 19) added transmission to the Bond Review Board. The House amendment is the operative difference between House committee text and enrollment. The Senate concurred May 26. History.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Consistent information could help the agency and people examining school borrowing compare proposed projects with how proceeds are used. Districts and charter schools face data-collection, submission and correction work. The law is a reporting measure: it does not itself approve a bond, change a tax rate, establish a spending cap or guarantee that projects stay on budget. Whether and how the database has been implemented requires separate operational evidence; this briefing does not claim it is already online. Required information and implementation condition.
All five fiscal-note versions were reviewed. The final-matching May 21 note for the bill as passed the second house estimates a $3 million General Revenue cost for fiscal years 2026–2027, based on a third-party contract costing $1.5 million annually; its five-year table continues that annual estimate through 2030. It repeats the funding condition and says the bill makes no appropriation. Local education agencies must provide the information, but their reporting costs are not quantified. These are projected implementation costs, not proof of an appropriation or actual spending.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.