2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB850

SB850 removes refund-application requirements for property-tax refunds of at least $20, broadens payment deadlines and revises interest and enforcement rules.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the payment of certain ad valorem tax refunds.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Middleton. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB850 removes refund-application requirements for property-tax refunds of at least $20, broadens payment deadlines and revises interest and enforcement rules. It applies only when refund liability arises on or after September 1, 2025—not simply whenever an old tax payment is discovered. It was signed June 20, 2025. Final act, including Sections 15–16; History.

For an ordinary erroneous or excess payment under Section 31.11, the collector and auditor must agree that the payment was wrong or excessive. At $20 or more, the collector must refund it or apply it to taxes owed for the following tax year; a separate application is unnecessary. Below $20, this particular refund route requires an application. The law removes the former dollar-based governing-board approval requirement, but retains permitted offsets against delinquent taxes when the statutory ownership conditions are met. It does not promise an immediate cash payment in every case. Sections 1 and 8; Prior procedure and retained provisions.

Collectors must mail notice of any overpayment, not just one of $5 or more. The notice must explain whether an application is needed and include a form for the under-$20 route. Required Section 31.11 applications generally remain due within three years of payment, with the existing possible good-cause extension. Other refund provisions can require no application even below $20—for example, the retained late-homestead and tax-roll-correction rules. The bill also repeals the former special population-based refund exception and the separate on-request form provision. Sections 3, 8 and 14; Late homestead refund; Tax-roll correction refund.

The expanded Section 31.12 list of refunds must be paid within 60 days after the liability date specified for that refund. The list covers specified exemptions, tax-rate and tax-roll corrections, overpayments, duplicate payments and other listed situations—not every conceivable refund. Timely payment carries no interest under this section; late payment carries 12% annual interest from the liability date through payment. This replaces the former 1% for each month or part-month calculation and removes the former under-$5 exclusion. The liability date varies: examples include notice of an approved exemption, mailing corrected tax bills after a tax-rate election, or the auditor’s overpayment determination. The disaster-exemption rule’s blanket no-interest sentence is removed. The bill does not rewrite every deadline in the referenced provisions: Section 23.1243(d), for example, still contains its separate 45-day fleet-transaction refund language. Sections 2 and 10, including the complete list and date rules; Prior interest rule; Separate fleet-transaction refund provision.

For approved late veterans-organization exemptions involving taxes paid under protest, the collector must directly refund the tax, penalties and interest instead of referring the organization through the ordinary application route. The late-homestead and disabled-veteran refund deadlines move into the expanded Section 31.12 framework; deleting their old standalone deadline sentences does not remove the payment deadline. Separate deadlines remain important. Tax-collector escrow surpluses must be returned within 60 days after the collector determines the excess; the final bill does not add those escrow refunds to Section 31.12’s interest list. For conditional payments retained through an appeal, the 60-day clock starts when the chief appraiser notifies the collector of the final determination; late refunds carry 12% annual interest from the taxes’ delinquency date. If the chief appraiser caused that delay, the appraisal district reimburses the collector for the required interest. Sections 6–7.

Refunds after binding arbitration or State Office of Administrative Hearings tax appeals must be paid within 60 days of the final determination; late payment carries 12% annual interest from the delinquency date. For specified boundary-dispute refunds, an agreement now follows Section 31.12; a Supreme Court order triggers a 60-day deadline instead of 180 days, with the stated 12% late-interest rule. These appeal and order rules do not all use the same start date as the general refund rule. Sections 9, 11 and 13.

For court tax appeals under Chapter 42, the existing 9.5% annual interest remains, but the owner may waive it. The 12% late-interest trigger moves to failure to refund before the 60th day after the final appeal determination, rather than after appraisal-roll certification. A prevailing owner can recover costs and reasonable attorney’s fees in a suit filed on or after that 60th day, replacing the former 180-day certification-based rule. A final judgment cannot demand an IRS form as a refund prerequisite unless federal law requires it. Section 12; Existing court-appeal refund framework.

Section 31.11 refund suits have a different filing rule: when no application is required, suit must be filed within 60 days after receipt of the overpayment notice; when an application is required, within 60 days after denial. The existing possible court-cost and attorney-fee award remains, with fees capped at the greater of $1,500 or 30% of the refund the court finds due. These lawsuit deadlines should not be confused with the collector’s payment deadline. Section 8, amended 31.11(k).

What changed along the way?

All five official versions were compared. The Senate committee substitute changed proposed 45-day general and escrow payment deadlines to 60 days and removed escrow refunds from the general interest list. The Senate committee, engrossed and House committee operative texts then matched.

The sole indexed amendment, Bonnen’s House amendment adopted May 27, raised the proposed no-application threshold from $1 to $20, allowed a credit toward the following tax year, changed the conditional-payment appeal deadline to run from chief-appraiser notice, and required appraisal-district reimbursement when the chief appraiser causes the specified delay. All eight instructions in that amendment survive enrollment. The Senate concurred May 30. The $1 threshold and 45-day deadlines are not the final law. History.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Taxpayers gain fewer application and board-approval hurdles, clearer payment deadlines and stronger remedies for specified late refunds. Collectors, auditors and appraisal districts must track different triggering dates, notices, credits and interest obligations. Some taxpayers still must apply, and automatic treatment can mean a next-year credit rather than cash. The act changes refund administration; it does not itself lower property appraisals or tax rates. Enacted rules.

All four fiscal notes were reviewed. The final-matching May 28 note for the bill as passed the second house anticipates no state fiscal impact and no significant local-government fiscal impact. That does not erase the express interest liabilities or administrative work. The note does not quantify taxpayers’ savings or local late-payment costs; its narrative should be read with the final text’s refund-or-credit option.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.