← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB863
SB863 changes where Edwards Aquifer water may be used and separately lets state regulators authorize treated reclaimed water for underground storage and later recovery.
Official caption: Relating to water withdrawn from the Edwards Aquifer and to the use of certain reclaimed water in an aquifer storage and recovery project.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Perry. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB863 changes where Edwards Aquifer water may be used and separately lets state regulators authorize treated reclaimed water for underground storage and later recovery.
- For water withdrawn from the Edwards Aquifer, the act permits use within the Edwards Aquifer Authority’s boundaries or within a retail public utility’s certificated service area, fixed as that certificate existed on September 1, 2025, if any part of the area lay inside the authority on June 28, 1996.
- The same final subsection also expressly says withdrawn water may not be transported outside the authority’s boundaries by pipeline or other means for any purpose.
- The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality may authorize injection of reclaimed water treated to standards it adopts, by rule or an individual or general permit.
- The new authorization applies notwithstanding the existing state subsection requiring consideration of compliance with federal Safe Drinking Water Act standards.
What does it do?
SB863 changes where Edwards Aquifer water may be used and separately lets state regulators authorize treated reclaimed water for underground storage and later recovery. These are distinct provisions; the reclaimed-water change is in the statewide Water Code, not limited by its text to the Edwards Aquifer. Signed June 20, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025. Final act; History.
For water withdrawn from the Edwards Aquifer, the act permits use within the Edwards Aquifer Authority’s boundaries or within a retail public utility’s certificated service area, fixed as that certificate existed on September 1, 2025, if any part of the area lay inside the authority on June 28, 1996. A certificate of convenience and necessity identifies the utility’s authorized service area; this is not an open-ended allowance for future territory. The prior authority-act wording limited use to the authority’s boundaries. Section 1; Authority’s pre-2025 act compilation, Section 1.34(b).
The same final subsection also expressly says withdrawn water may not be transported outside the authority’s boundaries by pipeline or other means for any purpose. Both sentences must be read together; this briefing does not resolve their application to a particular pipeline or service location. The official sponsor’s statement describes the purpose as addressing utilities whose longstanding service areas straddle the boundary. That explanation is not a substitute for the final transport restriction or proof that any particular utility qualifies. Exact enacted wording.
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality may authorize injection of reclaimed water treated to standards it adopts, by rule or an individual or general permit. This is part of aquifer storage and recovery—putting water underground for later recovery and beneficial use. It is not permission to inject untreated wastewater or an automatic permit for a project. Section 2; Storage-and-recovery definitions.
The new authorization applies notwithstanding the existing state subsection requiring consideration of compliance with federal Safe Drinking Water Act standards. The act does not delete the other listed considerations about recoverability, existing wells and groundwater quality, or the existing location and notice requirements. It should not be described as removing all water-quality regulation or rewriting federal law. New Section 27.153(b-1); Existing authorization framework.
What changed along the way?
All five versions were read and compared. The introduced bill contained the certificated-area use provision but not the express outside-boundary transport prohibition. The Senate committee substitute added that prohibition, which survives in the final act; the Senate committee, engrossed and House committee operative texts match.
The sole indexed floor amendment, Buckley’s House amendment adopted May 27, added the reclaimed-water authorization and renumbered the effective-date section. Both instructions survive enrollment. The Senate concurred May 30. The aquifer-storage provision was therefore not part of the introduced bill or its initial fiscal estimate. History.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Qualifying utilities gain a specified service-area use rule, subject to the final text’s limits. The reclaimed-water provision may give water suppliers another storage option, but treatment, permitting, technical feasibility and remaining protections still matter. Neither clause guarantees more available water, lower rates or approval of a particular project. Requirements and limits.
All four fiscal notes were reviewed. Unlike the early notes, the final-matching May 29 note for the bill as passed the second house estimates a $1,153,162 cost to the General Revenue-Dedicated Water Resource Management Account for fiscal years 2026–2027: $593,581 in 2026 and $559,581 in 2027, supporting four full-time-equivalent positions. The annual estimate remains $559,581 through 2030. The headline $0 for General Revenue-related funds is not a zero-cost estimate for all funds. The note assumes more storage-project permit work but says the agency supplied no estimated application count. Local fiscal effects are undetermined. The act itself makes no appropriation.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.