2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB870

SB870 lets appointed school marshals openly carry a handgun while wearing a uniform identifying them as a school marshal.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the open carrying of a handgun by a uniformed school marshal.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Birdwell. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB870 lets appointed school marshals openly carry a handgun while wearing a uniform identifying them as a school marshal. It covers public school districts, open-enrollment charter schools, private schools and public junior colleges. It took effect when signed on May 19, 2025, and applies beginning with the 2025–2026 school year. Final act; History.

The governing body’s written regulations must provide the options of carrying concealed on the marshal’s person, carrying openly while wearing the identifying uniform, or possessing the handgun in a locked and secured safe or other locked and secured location on school premises. Public-school and junior-college marshals remain limited to the particular school or campus designated by the governing body. The uniform condition attaches to open carry, not to the concealed-carry option. Sections 1–4.

This is not general permission for teachers, students or visitors to carry guns. It applies to employees appointed through the school-marshal program. The existing program requires training and licensing through the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement, including a psychological examination. The act retains the requirement that a marshal’s handgun be loaded only with commission-approved frangible duty ammunition. Existing training and licensing; Ammunition and written regulations.

For public junior colleges, the act also combines two 2021 versions of the same subsection. It preserves the rule that regulations may not require an on-duty marshal to store the handgun in a locked container, alongside the available secured-storage option. That protection was already present in one of the 2021 versions; it is not a new requirement that every marshal openly carry. Prior junior-college law; Reenacted subsection (e).

What changed along the way?

All five bill versions were read and compared: the operative requirements stayed the same, apart from spacing in the introduced-to-substitute comparison. The amendment index lists no floor amendments. Earlier law provided concealed carry or secured possession. SB870 adds the uniformed open-carry option and harmonizes the overlapping junior-college provisions. Prior public-school provisions; Prior private-school provisions; Prior college provisions.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Appointed marshals gain a visible-carry option, and governing bodies must align their written regulations with the amended choices. A uniform can make a marshal’s role visible, but the act does not establish that this will improve safety, require a school to appoint a marshal, or require all marshals to use open carry. Existing appointment frameworks remain in place. New option; Public-school appointment framework; Private-school framework; College framework.

The sole March 24 fiscal note anticipates no significant fiscal impact to the state or local governments and assumes implementation costs can be absorbed using existing resources. That is a budget estimate, not a finding that uniforms, training or policy changes will never cost money.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.