2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB888

SB888 allows the Texas attorney general to defend a district or county attorney in certain federal-court lawsuits about enforcement of state law.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the attorney general's defense of a district or county attorney against certain lawsuits in federal court.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Kolkhorst. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB888 allows the Texas attorney general to defend a district or county attorney in certain federal-court lawsuits about enforcement of state law. All three conditions must be met: the prosecutor is a defendant because of the prosecutor’s position; the cause of action relates to enforcement of a state statute; and the prosecutor requests the attorney general’s help. The new authority says “may,” not “shall,” so it does not guarantee representation. New subsection (c).

The act was signed May 24, 2025, and took effect September 1, 2025. It applies only to federal-court actions filed on or after that effective date; earlier actions remain governed by the former law. It does not grant immunity, dismiss lawsuits, decide the validity of a challenged statute or require payment of a judgment against a prosecutor. Scope and transition; History.

Existing mandatory-defense provisions remain separate. The prior section requires defense of a district attorney in a federal case when the defendant is sued because of the office, the claim accrued while the plaintiff was confined in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the prosecutor requests help, and no action is pending against the prosecutor in which the attorney general must represent the state. It also requires defense of a requesting state grand juror in a suit over official grand-jury duties. SB888 adds the broader discretionary state-statute-enforcement category, including county attorneys, without replacing those provisions. Existing subsections (a) and (b); Added authority.

What changed along the way?

All five versions were read and compared and have identical operative provisions. The index lists no floor amendments. The act adds subsection (c), updates the heading to include county attorneys and provides the prospective filing-date rule. It does not turn the existing mandatory categories into discretionary ones. Final act; Prior law.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Eligible local prosecutors gain another potential source of defense counsel and state legal resources. The attorney general decides whether to use this new authority after a qualifying request. A plaintiff’s underlying claim is not resolved merely because state lawyers join the defense. Discretionary defense authority.

The sole February 26 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal impact. The attorney general’s office said additional work could be absorbed within current resources. That is an estimate of administrative workload and cost, not a promise that every request will be accepted or that litigation is cost-free.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.