2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB905

SB905 changes speech-language pathology and audiology licensing, phases out a provisional-license route, and revises hearing-instrument sales rules.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the licensing and regulation of speech-language pathologists and audiologists.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Zaffirini. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB905 changes speech-language pathology and audiology licensing, phases out a provisional-license route, and revises hearing-instrument sales rules. For audiology, it expressly accepts either an audiology master’s degree conferred on or before December 31, 2007, or a doctoral degree in audiology or a related hearing science. The speech-language pathology minimum remains a master’s degree in communicative sciences or disorders. Accreditation requirements are moved into a shared subsection, not removed. Transcript/course requirements, at least 36 graduate-acceptable semester hours with at least 24 in the requested professional area, and required supervised clinical and professional experience remain. A qualifying degree alone does not guarantee a license. Section 2; Prior eligibility requirements.

The act removes section 401.308’s provisional-license process for qualifying practitioners licensed in another state. It retains the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation’s discretion to waive the examination and issue a license to someone holding the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association’s Certificate of Clinical Competence. It does not require an automatic examination waiver or create a blanket right to practice without a Texas license. Section 3.

Provisional licenses under section 401.308 already issued and in effect on September 1, 2025 remain valid until they expire, with the former provisions continued for that purpose; Chapter 401 as amended still applies to their holders. The department may not renew or extend those licenses on or after that date. A proceeding under Occupations Code Chapter 51 or 401 pending against a provisional-license holder on the license’s expiration date terminates then. This is a specified transition rule, not dismissal of every type of claim against the person. Section 7.

A licensed audiologist selling a hearing instrument to a person under 18 still needs a written statement presented by the person or a parent or guardian. A licensed physician must state that the hearing loss was medically evaluated within the six months before presentation and that the person may be considered a candidate for a hearing instrument. An ear specialist is no longer mandatory, but should perform the evaluation whenever practicable. “Hearing instrument” uses the prescription-hearing-aid definition; this change is not an over-the-counter authorization. Section 4; Chapter definitions; Incorporated prescription-device definition.

For hearing-instrument sales rules, the Texas Commission of Licensing and Regulation receives assistance from each chapter’s own advisory board rather than both boards together. Each provision now addresses its own chapter, while requirements for contracts, records, 30-day cancellation-trial guidelines and plain-language consumer information remain. The act was signed June 20, 2025 and took effect September 1, 2025. Its amended minor-sale rule applies to conduct on or after that date; earlier conduct follows the former law. Sections 1, 5, 6 and 8; History.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill proposed removing both advisory boards from the cited sales-rule provisions. The Senate committee substitute retained each chapter’s own board, removed cross-chapter references and simplified the physician wording. It did not yet include the older-master’s-degree alternative. All five versions were read and compared.

The index lists two amendments, both adopted and both retained in the final act. Senator Zaffirini’s May 7 Senate second-reading amendment F1 added the audiology master’s-degree alternative for degrees conferred by December 31, 2007 and moved accreditation language into subsection (a-1); it did not remove the other education and experience requirements. Representative Cunningham’s May 28 House second-reading amendment 1 added the “whenever practicable” ear-specialist language. It survives as section 401.404(b), without restoring an absolute specialist requirement. The engrossed and House committee versions match; the final version adds that House language. Final sections 2 and 4.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Applicants with qualifying older audiology master’s degrees gain an express statutory degree pathway, subject to the remaining requirements. People who would have used the removed provisional-license route must instead qualify through an available licensing pathway; existing holders receive only the stated transition, not renewal or extension. Families buying prescription hearing aids from audiologists for minors gain physician flexibility while the medical-evaluation safeguards remain. These changes do not guarantee lower prices, faster licensing or additional clinicians. Eligibility, transition and sales rules.

The May 28 fiscal note, labeled as passed by the second house anticipates no significant state or local fiscal impact and assumes costs can be absorbed with existing resources. All five indexed fiscal notes were checked and reach that same conclusion. They do not calculate individual tuition, licensing or medical costs.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.